230 GOP told SCOTUS to overturn Roe v. Wade

[Deschet]

Which is why you should stop this “stop being so extreme brah” act like anyone gives a shit. I know you don’t value life, I know you don’t want to reproduce, and I can reasonably assume you’re a biological male and won’t need an abortion at any point. So really, what more is there to say and what could possibly come from this discussion? The idiots who believe in infanticide will fade into obscurity over time while those who believe in the sanctity of life will continue to multiply. That’s really all there is to say to someone who believes as you do.

Thats an extremely kind characterization. I could call them self-obsessed, bloodthirsty whores that are going to burn in hell, which of course they are. You should take your wins where you can get them.

LOL. Yup. Nothing extreme there at all. Oh, and literally LOL at the notion of burning in Hell. That’s almost as quaint as Christians — because, they’re the only ones who believe in things like this — rooting for those whom they believe are sinners to go there. Do you believe in the Rapture as well? Devils and demons? Witches? Trolls?

[tOSUfanboi2]

Perhaps because there are more demonstrably evil people today in the Republican Party. I’m also sick of people saying the evils of each party are commensurate. They’re not. It’s not even close.

See?

Look man, enjoy your life. You’ve got about 30-40 years left max and you’re swiftly running out of time to enjoy the lifestyle to which you’ve become accustomed. Celebrate while you can and leave the big picture stuff to people who have skin in the game.

[tOSUfanboi2]

Well, I think you and I have different definitions of extreme. If it has two arms, two legs and a tail, that’s a bridge too far for me. I honestly don’t know when that happens.

Regardless, casting all or even most women who have had abortions as bimbos is kinda ridiculous.

Which is why you should stop this “stop being so extreme brah” act like anyone gives a shit. I know you don’t value life, I know you don’t want to reproduce, and I can reasonably assume you’re a biological male and won’t need an abortion at any point. So really, what more is there to say and what could possibly come from this discussion? The idiots who believe in infanticide will fade into obscurity over time while those who believe in the sanctity of life will continue to multiply. That’s really all there is to say to someone who believes as you do.

Thats an extremely kind characterization. I could call them self-obsessed, bloodthirsty whores that are going to burn in hell, which of course they are. You should take your wins where you can get them.

[Deschet]

Just FYI, you’re talking to someone who makes a point of pretending Republicans are an existential evil while repeatedly depicting Democrats as lovable good guys that just can’t get it together.

Perhaps because there are more demonstrably evil people today in the Republican Party. I’m also sick of people saying the evils of each party are commensurate. They’re not. It’s not even close.

[Deschet]

The majority of people of people aren’t, but that doesn’t mean anything and it also doesn’t have anything to do with Roe v Wade, which specifically gave no questions asked access to abortion. Why would people take to the streets and protest about it being overturned if they were against abortion in almost every circumstance that wasn’t extreme? Answer, they wouldn’t. Either that or they’re stupid and don’t understand the issue, which is very common with young bimbos that frequently get abortions.

Well, I think you and I have different definitions of extreme. If it has two arms, two legs and a tail, that’s a bridge too far for me. I honestly don’t know when that happens.

Regardless, casting all or even most women who have had abortions as bimbos is kinda ridiculous.

[tOSUfanboi2]

You know as well as I do that politicians are held to, amd evaluated on, the positions that they are pushing legislation for.

Just FYI, you’re talking to someone who makes a point of pretending Republicans are an existential evil while repeatedly depicting Democrats as lovable good guys that just can’t get it together.

[tOSUfanboi2]

Man… I’m sure that there are those on the fringe who are. But, the overwhelming majority of women I know don’t feel that way. How about you? Are the majority of women you know all pro-abortion? I can’t imagine that’s the case.

The majority of people of people aren’t, but that doesn’t mean anything and it also doesn’t have anything to do with Roe v Wade, which specifically gave no questions asked access to abortion. Why would people take to the streets and protest about it being overturned if they were against abortion in almost every circumstance that wasn’t extreme? Answer, they wouldn’t. Either that or they’re stupid and don’t understand the issue, which is very common with young bimbos that frequently get abortions.

[ibleed]

Perhaps they have their own personal limits?

You know as well as I do that politicians are held to, amd evaluated on, the positions that they are pushing legislation for.

[Deschet]

I don't know about "most", but enough to have governors and congressmen pushing for no-limits.

Perhaps they have their own personal limits?

[Deschet]

I don't think most people give a shit. Most "advocates" are absolutely arguing no limits and I can provide you with links if you want them.

Man… I’m sure that there are those on the fringe who are. But, the overwhelming majority of women I know don’t feel that way. How about you? Are the majority of women you know all pro-abortion? I can’t imagine that’s the case.

[ibleed]

Are you saying that most pro-choice advocates are arguing no-limits?

I don't know about "most", but enough to have governors and congressmen pushing for no-limits.

[tOSUfanboi2]

Are you saying that most pro-choice advocates are arguing no-limits?

I don't think most people give a shit. Most "advocates" are absolutely arguing no limits and I can provide you with links if you want them.

[Deschet]

Most people (myself included) fall into the category that abortion should be "safe, legal, rare", with "rare" being the important part. Almost 20% of pregnancies ending in abortion is not "rare".

When we have people advocating abortion up and until 9 months for any reason whatsoever, you know it's no longer about "choice" and rather it being about abortion for the sake of abortion. When we have governors calling for similar policies, you know it's no longer an "outlier".

Are you saying that most pro-choice advocates are arguing no-limits?

[ibleed]

Meh. I disagree. The people bombing things are fringe for either side. They are the statistical outliers. Again. This is a Bell Curve. Most are somewhat conflicted. Most would not call themselves pro-abortion. Remember, a person who is pro-choice can still choose not to have an abortion.

Most people (myself included) fall into the category that abortion should be "safe, legal, rare", with "rare" being the important part. Almost 20% of pregnancies ending in abortion is not "rare".

When we have people advocating abortion up and until 9 months for any reason whatsoever, you know it's no longer about "choice" and rather it being about abortion for the sake of abortion. When we have governors calling for similar policies, you know it's no longer an "outlier".

[Deschet]

Adoption leads to child molestation so fuck off with your let rape babies be adopted plan

The world has 7b unhappy people we don't need more. Even the world's richest man is unhappy - divorced dad of some 7 kids

Let the adults talk.