Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gun Nuts - GFY - SCOTUS rejects lifting gun silencer ban

Collapse

Google Ads

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gun Nuts - GFY - SCOTUS rejects lifting gun silencer ban

    Supreme Court rejects challenge to regulation of gun silencers

    The Supreme Court is rejecting a challenge to federal regulation of gun silencers, just days after a gunman used one in a shooting rampage that killed 12 people in Virginia.

    The justices did not comment Monday in turning away appeals from two Kansas men who were convicted of violating federal law regulating silencers. The men argued that the constitutional right "to keep and bear arms" included silencers.

  • #2
    What legal justification could someone have for owning a silencer?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by riker7 View Post
      What legal justification could someone have for owning a silencer?
      Silencers protect the shooter's ears from loud noises!. Think of the health benefits of the person getting shot.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by sctrojan View Post

        Silencers protect the shooter's ears from loud noises!. Think of the health benefits of the person getting shot.
        That's a good one. You should lobby for the silencer industry.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by riker7 View Post

          That's a good one. You should lobby for the silencer industry.
          That's an actual excuse by the gun lobby - not mine.

          Comment


          • #6
            <----does not own a silencer.
            <----does not want a silencer.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post
              <----does not own a silencer.
              <----does not want a silencer.
              But you do argue for a gun owner's right to own a silencer

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by sctrojan View Post

                But you do argue for a gun owner's right to own a silencer
                no i dont. Why would you lie about that?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post

                  no i dont. Why would you lie about that?
                  lie? How is it a lie when I don't know what your position on gun regulations is? You fucks don't understand English or what?

                  The word you want to use is misrepresent or mischaracterise - but lie is not the word you use in this case

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by sctrojan View Post

                    lie? How is it a lie when I don't know what your position on gun regulations is? You fucks don't understand English or what?

                    The word you want to use is misrepresent or mischaracterise - but lie is not the word you use in this case
                    You should ask my opinion. Not make assumptions based on no evidence.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by riker7 View Post
                      What legal justification could someone have for owning a silencer?
                      They're mufflers for guns. I'm surpised they're even regulated in the states considering they're over the counter items in european countries. Iirc, it's even illegal to hunt without one in Germany.

                      The people who ask the question you're asking have fallen for the hollywood myth about them. They don't make the weapons more dangerous, they don't increase the number of people killed by guns when they are used. They're not mirqcle workers, their primary function is ti reduce the noise signature of a weapon. You're talking reducing the sound of a gunshot from being as loud as a commercial grade firework down to a blackcat.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post
                        <----does not own a silencer.
                        <----does not want a silencer.
                        <----owns a silencer and I love it. I recommend getting one if you do a lot shooting at indoor ranges.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DSMoneypit View Post

                          They're mufflers for guns. I'm surpised they're even regulated in the states considering they're over the counter items in european countries. Iirc, it's even illegal to hunt without one in Germany.

                          The people who ask the question you're asking have fallen for the hollywood myth about them. They don't make the weapons more dangerous, they don't increase the number of people killed by guns when they are used. They're not mirqcle workers, their primary function is ti reduce the noise signature of a weapon. You're talking reducing the sound of a gunshot from being as loud as a commercial grade firework down to a blackcat.
                          This is an area where DSM and I will agree when it comes to gun laws.

                          Who gives a shit if you have a silencer. It doesn’t make a gun shoot more rounds, faster, or with more killing power.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by DSMoneypit View Post

                            <----owns a silencer and I love it. I recommend getting one if you do a lot shooting at indoor ranges.
                            And that’s for you. I personally don’t like the extra attention you get from the ATF you get by legally owning one. I’ll pass.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post

                              You should ask my opinion. Not make assumptions based on no evidence.
                              So its not a fucking lie if I don't know what your fucking opinions are fuckface.

                              Seriously DynastFU your english is as bad as Trump's

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X