Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump wanting a special prime time slot tomorrow night

Collapse

Google Ads

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by PBS View Post
    If they don't carry it it will be a very bad turning point in this country's history. It will pretty much mark the end of any semblance of a fair and objective press.

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    On Thursday night, President Obama gave a primetime address on his planned executive actions concerning immigration reform. It's a politically volatile move opposed by most Republicans and considered long overdue by immigration reform advocates, and it is a very big deal.

    Most people did not watch this primetime address. The White House floated the idea of running the speech at 8 p.m. by the major networks, and were greeted with little more than a "Mmm, no thanks."

    ABC, NBC, Fox and CBS knew that their customers would not be happy if the President ate into time reserved for some of the most popular shows on television, including "The Big Bang Theory" and "Bones."
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.0f3c400d9c96

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by PBS View Post
      If they don't carry it it will be a very bad turning point in this country's history. It will pretty much mark the end of any semblance of a fair and objective press.

      Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
      Didn't your lord and master already tell you that the press is FAKE NEWS and THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE?

      Of course, you may have missed that after passing out due to that leash being jerked around so hard. Or the blackout from the alcohol. Whichever it is.

      All hail Trump! MAGA! Border blades! Keep the Mexicans fed so they don't slip through!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by PBS View Post
        So much hatred

        Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
        Ahh. More “debate” skills on display.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by PBS View Post
          If they don't carry it it will be a very bad turning point in this country's history. It will pretty much mark the end of any semblance of a fair and objective press.

          Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
          LOL. You act like it’s the first time the media don’t cover a Primetime Presidential address. Obama had one that wasn’t covered. I think Dubya had one as well.

          Personally, I just hope they run it live with a picture-in-picture fact checker to call out more lies in real-time.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Nash View Post

            Didn't your lord and master already tell you that the press is FAKE NEWS and THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE?

            Of course, you may have missed that after passing out due to that leash being jerked around so hard. Or the blackout from the alcohol. Whichever it is.

            All hail Trump! MAGA! Border blades! Keep the Mexicans fed so they don't slip through!
            PBR thinks that Trump should be afforded dictatorial powers and compel the networks to run his address. LOL.

            Comment


            • #36
              Illegal and impeachable: using money NOT appropriated by congress to build wall.

              Legal: Using money given to Homeland sec or DoD with vague or loose instructions on its usage. For example. If the Secretary of HS is told to use funds as the secretary deems appropriate, then Trump (being her boss) can tell her it is appropriate to build a wall with those funds.

              I hope he offers DACA for the wall. Everybody wins in that scenario. Especially since congress already passed a law to build a wall in 2006.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post
                Illegal and impeachable: using money NOT appropriated by congress to build wall.

                Legal: Using money given to Homeland sec or DoD with vague or loose instructions on its usage. For example. If the Secretary of HS is told to use funds as the secretary deems appropriate, then Trump (being her boss) can tell her it is appropriate to build a wall with those funds.

                I hope he offers DACA for the wall. Everybody wins in that scenario. Especially since congress already passed a law to build a wall in 2006.
                Yeah he rejected DACA for 20Billion - now he's gonna hafta give up DACA for 5 billion - that's some amazing negotiating skillz.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by DynastyFSU2 View Post
                  Illegal and impeachable: using money NOT appropriated by congress to build wall.

                  Legal: Using money given to Homeland sec or DoD with vague or loose instructions on its usage. For example. If the Secretary of HS is told to use funds as the secretary deems appropriate, then Trump (being her boss) can tell her it is appropriate to build a wall with those funds.

                  I hope he offers DACA for the wall. Everybody wins in that scenario. Especially since congress already passed a law to build a wall in 2006.


                  2006, before we had cost efficient drones with HD cameras attached.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Fired up for this. Wife and I are gonna enjoy a bottle of bubbly while watching


                    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ivegostdacityblues View Post



                      2006, before we had cost efficient drones with HD cameras attached.
                      Oh good, we'll take a picture of them. That will keep them out!

                      Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by PBS View Post
                        Oh good, we'll take a picture of them. That will keep them out!

                        Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
                        You do know that Drones can track illegals using infrared cams and give the exact location for border agents to drive up in their 4x4s and arrest them - how do you not know simple shit like this.

                        we have helicopters in LA chasing down drivers failing to stop and they have a 100% success rate. every single high speed chase comes to an end thanks to helicopters.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by PBS View Post
                          Fired up for this. Wife and I are gonna enjoy a bottle of bubbly while watching


                          Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
                          Thunderbird doesn't have bubbles.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by BChris View Post

                            Thunderbird doesn't have bubbles.
                            WTH is that?

                            Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by PBS View Post
                              WTH is that?

                              Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
                              Yeah right...

                              http://www.bumwine.com/tbird.html

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by PBS View Post
                                WTH is that?

                                Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
                                Ask your wife. She knows.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X